The beginning of the soviet theoretical archaeology: theoretical studies at the Institute of archaeology AS UkrSSR in the 1960s

Keywords: history of archaeology, archaeological theory, institutional history, Ukrainian archaeology, Yu. N. Zakharuk, 1960s

Abstract

The article is dedicated to an exploration of archaeological theory issues at the Institute of archaeology AS UkrSSR in the 1960s. This period is one of the worst studied in the history of Soviet archaeology. But it was the time when in the USSR archaeological researches reached the summit, quantitative methods and methods of natural sciences were applied and interest in theoretical issues had grown in archaeology. Now there are a lot of publications dedicated to theoretical discussions between archaeologists from Leningrad but the same researches about Kyiv scholars are still unknown. The archaeological theory includes both generalizations made on the basis of archaeological sources and archaeological methodology. The article emphasizes the history of methodology studies at the IA AS UkrSSR during the mentioned period. The research is based on evidence from the annual reports on a work of the Institute from the Scientific archive of the Institute of Archaeology NASU. According to the documents the theory was mentioned in the early 1950s because of publication of new J. V. Stalin’s works. However, that time as well as at the beginning of the next decade, when works started under three volumes of “The Archaeology of the UkrSSR”, it was written that attention to theoretical issues was focused at the Institute, not enough. At the IA AS UkrSSR discussions on archaeological methodology started in the 1960s when papers on theoretical issues, applying cybernetic, methods of natural sciences and statistical methods into archaeology were regularly presented at sessions of the Academic council. Yu. N. Zakharuk was the most active employee of the Institute who worked in this field. In addition to presentation of papers at conferences, and sessions of the Academic council and publications, he was an executor of the scheduled work ‘Methodological and methodic issues of archaeological science’ in 1968–1970. Also it was planed to publish a book on theoretical issues. In other words, the IA AS UkrSSR was the first archaeological establishment in the USSR where the work on archaeological methodology was scheduled. According to circumstances this work had not been completely finished but the Ukrainian scholar was invited to hold the position of deputy director at the Institute of Archaeology AS USSR in Moscow. Despite a skeptical attitude to the theory among most Soviet archaeologists Yu. N. Zakharuk was able to intensify the work on theoretical issues in Soviet archaeology. A separate theoretical session, which was organized by him at the Plenum of the IA AS USSR in Moscow in 1972, might be considered as an initialization of theoretical archaeology as a new sub-discipline in the USSR.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abashyna, N. S., & Kolesnykova, V. A. (2015). Narysy istorii Instytutu arkheolohii [Outlines of a History of the Institute of Archaeology]. In P. P. Tolochko, (Ed.), Instytut arkheolohii Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy. 1918–2014 [The Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. 1918–2014] (pp. 11–98). Kyiv: PH “ADEF-Ukraina” [in Ukrainian].

Archive of the Russian Academy of Science – ARAS, f. 1909, d. 1, c. 1013: The Report on Scientific and Research Work of the Institute of Archaeology of the AS USSR in 1971, 57 sheets [in Russian].

Bibikov, S. N. (1967). Opyt paleoekonomicheskogo modelirovaniya [An Experience in Paleoeconomic Modeling]. Tezisy dokladov Vsesoyuznoy sessii, posvyashchennoy itogam arkheologicheskikh i etnograficheskikh issledovaniy 1966 g. – Abstracts of Papers of the All-Union Session on Results of Archaeological and Ethnographical Researches in 1966 (pp. 12–15). Chisinau [in Russian].

Bibikov, S. N. (1969). Nekotoryye aspekty paleoekonomicheskogo modelirovaniya paleolita [Certain Aspects of Paleoeconomic Modeling of the Palaeolithic]. Sovetskaya arkheologiya – Soviet Archaeology, (4), 5–22. Retrieved from https://www.archaeolog.ru/media/books_sov_archaeology/1969_book04.pdf [in Russian].

Bulkin, V. A., Klejn, L. S., & Lebedev, G. S. (1982). Attainment and Problems of Soviet Archaeology. World Archaeology, 13(3), 272–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1982.9979834.

Gening, V. F. (1989). Struktura arkheologicheskogo poznaniya (problemy sotsialno-istoricheskikh issledovaniy) [The Structure of Archaeological Cognition (Problems of Social and Historical researches)]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Russian].

Klejn, L. S. (1993). Fenomen sovetskoy arkheologii [The Phenomenon of Soviet Archaeology]. St.-Petersburg: Farn [in Russian].

Klejn, L. S. (2012). Soviet Archaeology: Schools, Trends, and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199601356.001.0001

Klejn, L. S. (2014). Arkheologi sovetskoy epokhi [Archaeologists of the Soviet era]. In Istoriya rossiyskoy arkheologii: ucheniya, shkoly i lichnosti. [A History of the Soviet Archaeology: Doctrines, Schools and Persons] (Vol. 2). St.-Petersburg: Eurasia [in Russian].

Liashko, S. M., & Videiko, M. Yu. (2015). Zakharuk Yurii Mykolaiovych [Zakharuk Yurii Mykolaiovych] In P. P. Tolochko (Eds.), Instytut arkheolohii Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy. 1918–2014. – The Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. 1918–2014 (pp. 309–310). Kyiv: PH “ADEF-Ukraina” [in Ukrainian].

Makarov, N. A. (Ed.). (2019). Institut arkheologii RAN: 100 let istorii [The Institute of Archaeology of RAS: 100 years of history]. Moscow: IA RAS [in Russian].

Nosov, N. E. (Ed.). (2013). Akademicheskaya arkheologiya na beregakh Nevy (ot RAIMK do IIMK RAN, 1919–2014 gg.) [Academic Archaeology on the Banks of the Neva (from RAHMC to IHMC RAS, 1919–2014)]. St. Petersburg: Dmitry Bulanin [in Russian].

Paliienko, S. V. (2015). Metodolohichni seminary naukovykh ustanov AN SRSR ta URSR yak zasib rozvytku radianskoi teoretychnoi arkheolohii [Methodological Workshops in Scientific Establishments of the AS USSR and the AS UkSSR as an Instrument of the Soviet Theoretical Archaeology Development]. Materialy i doslidzhennia z arkheolohii Prykarpattia i Volyni – Materials and Studies on Archaeology of Sub-Carpathian and Volhynian Area, (19), 392–397. Retrieved from http://www.inst-ukr.lviv.ua/en/publications/materials/documents/?newsid=582 [in Ukrainian].

Paliienko, S. V. (2016). V.F. Gening i formirovaniye kiyevskogo tsentra teoreticheskoy arkheologii [V.F. Gening and Development of the Kiev Center for Theoretical Archaeology]. Kratkiye soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii – Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology, (242), 232–244. Retrieved from https://www.archaeolog.ru/media/ksia/ksia-242-redu.pdf#page=233 [in Russian].

Paliienko, S. V. (2017). Diialnist Yu. M. Zakharuka z orhanizatsii sektsii teorii ta metodyky na Plenumi Instytutu Arkheolohii AN SRSR 1972 roku [Yuriy Zakharuk’s activity on the organization of theoretical session at the Annual Plenum of Institute of Archeology of the Academy of Science of the USSR in 1972]. Pratsi Tsentru pamiatkoznavstva: Zbirka naukovykh prats – Works of the Center for the Study of Monuments: A collection of scientific papers, (31), 20–28 [in Ukrainian].

Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology NAS of Ukraine – SA IA NASU, f. 62, d. 1, c. 564: The Report on Research and Scientific Organizational Work of the Institute in 1965, 48 sheets [in Russian].

Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology NAS of Ukraine– SA IA NASU, f. 62, d. 1, c. 626: The Report on Research and Scientific Organizational Work of the Institute in 1967, 44 sheets [in Russian].

Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology NAS of Ukraine– SA IA NASU, f. 62, d. 1, c. 704: The Report on Research and Scientific Organizational Activity of the Institute in 1970, 50 sheets [in Russian].

Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology NAS of Ukraine – SA IA NASU, f. 62, d. 1-ad., c. 1950/3: The Report of the IA AS of UkrSSR in 1950, 29 sheets [in Russian].

Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology NAS of Ukraine – SA IA NASU, f. 62, d. 1-ad., c. 1952/2: The Report on Research and Scientific Organizational Activity of the Institute in 1952, 41 sheets [in Russian].

Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology NAS of Ukraine – SA IA NASU, f. 62, d. 1-ad., c. 1960/1: The Report on Research and Scientific Organizational Activity of the Institute in 1960, 39 sheets [in Russian].

Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology NAS of Ukraine– SA IA NASU, f. 62, d. 1-ad., c. 1961/5: The Report on Research and Scientific Organizational Activity of the Institute in 1961, 41 sheets [in Russian].

Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology NAS of Ukraine – SA IA NASU, f. 62, d. 1-ad., c. 1962/2: The Report on Research and Scientific Organizational Activity of the Institute in 1962, 39 sheets [in Russian].

Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology NAS of Ukraine – SA IA NASU, f. 62, d. 1-ad., c. 1963/1: The Report on Research and Scientific Organizational Activity of the Institute in 1963, 43 sheets [in Russian].

Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology NAS of Ukraine – SA IA NASU, f. 62, d. 1-ad., c. 1969/1: The Report on Research and Scientific Organizational Activity of the Institute in 1969, 48 sheets [in Russian].

Tolochko, P. P. (Ed.). (2015). Instytut arkheolohii Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy. 1918–2014. [The Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. 1918–2014]. Kyiv: PH “ADEF-Ukraina” [in Ukrainian].

Trigger, B. G. (1989). A history of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Trigger, B. G. (2006). A History of Archaeological Thought. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016.

Zakharuk, Yu. N. (1971, August 16). Pis'mo Leo Klejnu [The letter to Leo Klejn]. Leo Klejn’s personal archive [in Russian].

Zakharuk, Yu. N. (1964). Problemy arkheolohichnoi kultury [Problems of Archaeological Culture]. Arkheolohiia – The Archaeology, (ХVІІ), 12–42. Retrieved from http://www.vgosau.kiev.ua/a/Archaeology_1964_17.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Zakharuk, Yu. N. (1969). O metodologii arkheologicheskoy nauki i yeye problemakh [On the methodology of Archaeological Science and its Problems]. Sovetskaya arkheologiya – Soviet Archaeology, (3), 11–20. Retrieved from https://www.archaeolog.ru/media/books_sov_archaeology/1969_book03.pdf [in Russian].

Zakharuk, Yu. N. (1970a). Deiaki metodolohichni pytannia v arkheolohichnii nautsi. [Certain Methodological Issues in Archaeological Science]. Arkheolohiia – The Archaeology, (24), 3–11. Retrieved from http://www.vgosau.kiev.ua/a/Archaeology_1970_24.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Zakharuk, Yu. N. (1970b). Leninskoye teoreticheskoye naslediye i arkheologicheskoye naslediye [Lenin’s Theoretical Legacy and Archaeological Heritage] In P. I. Zasurtsev (Ed.), Leninskiye idei v izuchenii istorii pervobytnogo obshchestva, rabovladeniya i feodalizma – Lenin’s Ideas in the Study of the History of Primitive society, Slavery and Feudalism (pp. 7–16). Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].

Zakharuk, Yu. N. (1970c). Leninskoye teoreticheskoye naslediye i nekotoryye voprosy razvitiya arkheologicheskoy nauki [Lenin’s Theoretical Legacy and Certain Issues of the Development of Archaeological Science]. Sovetskaya arkheologiya – Soviet Archaeology, (2), 8–17. Retrieved from https://www.archaeolog.ru/media/books_sov_archaeology/1970_book02.pdf [in Russian].

Zakharuk, Yu. N. (1971). Do rozrobky teoretychnykh osnov arkheolohii [Towards the Development of Theoretical Grounds of Archaeology]. Arkheolohiia – The Archaeology, (1), 7–13. Retrieved from http://www.vgosau.kiev.ua/a/Archaeology_1971_01.pdf [in Ukrainian].


Abstract views: 434
PDF Downloads: 257
Published
2021-06-26
How to Cite
Paliienko, S. (2021). The beginning of the soviet theoretical archaeology: theoretical studies at the Institute of archaeology AS UkrSSR in the 1960s. History of Science and Technology, 11(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.32703/2415-7422-2021-11-1-54-67